Legislature(2007 - 2008)
2008-02-27 House Journal
Full Journal pdf2008-02-27 House Journal Page 2100 HB 65 The following was read the second time: HOUSE BILL NO. 65 "An Act relating to breaches of security involving personal information, credit report and credit score security freezes, consumer credit monitoring, credit accuracy, protection of social security numbers, care of records, disposal of records, identity theft, furnishing consumer credit header information, credit cards, 2008-02-27 House Journal Page 2101 and debit cards, and to the jurisdiction of the office of administrative hearings; amending Rule 60, Alaska Rules of Civil Procedure; and providing for an effective date." with the: Journal Page L&C RPT CS(L&C) 2DP 3NR 1AM 886 FN1: INDETERMINATE(GOV/ALL DEPTS) 887 FN2: (ADM) 887 JUD RPT CS(JUD) NT 4DP 2AM 1151 FN1: INDETERMINATE(GOV/ALL DEPTS) 1152 FN2: (ADM) 1152 FIN RPT CS(FIN) NT 4DP 5NR 2048 FN3: INDETERMINATE(GOV/ALL DEPTS) 2049 FN4: (ADM) 2049 Representative Samuels moved and asked unanimous consent that the following committee substitute be adopted in lieu of the original bill: CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 65(FIN) "An Act relating to breaches of security involving personal information, credit report and credit score security freezes, protection of social security numbers, care of records, disposal of records, identity theft, credit cards, and debit cards, and to the jurisdiction of the office of administrative hearings; amending Rules 60 and 82, Alaska Rules of Civil Procedure; and providing for an effective date." There being no objection, it was so ordered. Representative Samuels moved and asked unanimous consent that CSHB 65(FIN) be considered engrossed, advanced to third reading, and placed on final passage. There being no objection, it was so ordered. CSHB 65(FIN) was read the third time. The question being: "Shall CSHB 65(FIN) pass the House?" The roll was taken with the following result: 2008-02-27 House Journal Page 2102 CSHB 65(FIN) Third Reading Final Passage YEAS: 35 NAYS: 0 EXCUSED: 4 ABSENT: 1 Yeas: Buch, Cissna, Coghill, Crawford, Dahlstrom, Doll, Doogan, Edgmon, Fairclough, Gara, Gardner, Gatto, Gruenberg, Guttenberg, Harris, Hawker, Holmes, Johnson, Joule, Kawasaki, Keller, Kelly, Kerttula, LeDoux, Lynn, Meyer, Nelson, Neuman, Roses, Salmon, Samuels, Seaton, Stoltze, Thomas, Wilson Excused: Foster, Johansen, Olson, Ramras Absent: Chenault And so, CSHB 65(FIN) passed the House. Representative Samuels moved and asked unanimous consent that the roll call on the passage of the bill be considered the roll call on the effective date clause. There being no objection, it was so ordered. Representative Samuels moved and asked unanimous consent that the roll call on the passage of the bill be considered the roll call on the court rule changes. There being no objection, it was so ordered. CSHB 65(FIN) was referred to the Chief Clerk for engrossment.